On the Krishnamurti Information Network website is an article by Lee Nichol titled Wholeness Regained – Revisiting Bohm’s Dialogue.

In this article Lee Nichol speaks to some of the origins/context of Bohm’s dialogue, what has happened with it and why it was not overly successful.  Nichole delineates David Bohm’s comment that, “‘I think people are not doing enough work on their own, apart from the dialogue groups”.  This delineation is summarized by Nichol:

In attempting to re-establish the wholeness of Bohm’s vision, we will examine three areas that are often absent from popular presentations of dialogue. Though hardly exhaustive, this short list – the self-image, the body, and meaning – will perhaps give some indication of the richness of inquiry that is available to those interested in the full scope of Bohm’s inquiry. As outlined here, these three areas are explored as they might look if a person were to work ‘on their own.’ How this exploration might look in the context of a dialogue group is a fascinating topic, perhaps one to be pursued in a later essay.

Nichol’s article goes on to explain the aforementioned three areas.